genuine cryptids (if they exist) would likely be intelligent enough to avoid them Right so we've moved the goalposts to 'it's so clever it avoids all evidence of its existence.' That's...
RationalRick: Because the default position should be "doesn't exist" not "exists but we can't find it." If something's out there, we should be finding dead ones, roadkill, DNA in water samples,...
The best part? The FOIA releases include witness sketches of what they saw, and it looks nothing like any natural phenomenon or Venus.
I've been following the Rendlesham Forest declassified documents for years, and I keep seeing people cite them as absolute proof of alien contact.
This is refreshingly sensible. The Thylacine example is perfect - we know they existed, we know they were hunted to extinction in mainland Australia but survived in Tasmania until 1936.
I felt absolutely certain it was watching me. That sensation is real and it's worth taking seriously. It's a primal instinct for danger detection.
Do you take readings at ground level, waist height, or does it matter? This actually matters loads. Take readings at three heights minimum - ground, waist, and about 2 metres up (or head height if...
The other factor: Bigfoot has the Patterson film. Even if it's a hoax (which most experts think), it gave Bigfoot a visual that entered popular culture.
Mate, classic shadow person encounter. They're not ghosts, they're inter-dimensional entities that feed on fear and disrupted sleep patterns.
I don't want to dismiss you, but this is exactly the kind of thing that spirals if you're not careful. You've read about abduction marks, you find marks, your anxiety confirms the connection.
Just finished The Haunting of Madley: New Perspectives on Pendle Hill by Dr Catherine Whitmore (£16.99, Paranormal History Press).
I have no memory of what happened during those hours. This is the bit that keeps me up at night, mate. I had a similar experience in 1998 near Rendlesham and I still don't know what happened.
the system renders more carefully when observed and less carefully when notThis is the bit that got me.
