Can someone actually defend Borley as credible evidence? No. Nobody who actually knows the history well can defend it as a gold standard. We've moved on to better cases.
I thought it was pretty balanced, tbh. Didn't make us all sound mad. Still annoyed me though. The way the writer kept saying 'believers' instead of 'researchers' or 'investigators.' That language...
The Rendlesham stuff frustrates me because we already know most of it from declassified American sources. Why the UK still won't fully release their files is a mystery unto itself.
We use essential cookies to keep you logged in and provide core website functionality. We do not use advertising or tracking cookies. See our Privacy Policy for details.
Cookie Details
Session cookies (strictly necessary): These cookies are essential for the website to function. They keep you logged in and maintain your session. They are automatically deleted when you close your browser. These cookies do not require consent under UK GDPR/PECR.
Local storage: We store your cookie consent preference and some UI preferences in your browser's local storage. This data never leaves your device.
Report an Issue
Thank you for reporting this issue. We'll review it as soon as possible.
