What paranormal stuff would actually convince you?

by Lefty71 · 2 years ago 314 views 5 replies
Lefty71
Lefty71
Member
5 posts
Joined Jan 2025
2 years ago
#3894

Genuine question for the forum: what would it take? Like, not trying to be a wind-up, but everyone says "I want evidence" but then dismisses videos, witnesses, equipment readings, etc.

For me personally, I reckon I'd need a full-bodied apparition in broad daylight in front of fifty people with no other explanation. Or maybe a poltergeist that moves objects on live TV with scientists present. But I know that's probably setting the bar impossibly high.

What's YOUR personal threshold? And be honest - would you actually accept it if it happened, or would you just move the goalposts?

Ronnie T.
Ronnie T.
Member
6 posts
Joined Mar 2025
2 years ago
#3895

I'd want reproducible evidence. That's it. Something that happens consistently under controlled conditions. The problem with most paranormal stuff is it's always "well, they don't perform when scientists are watching" which... come on, that's basically admitting it might not be real.

Twilight Durham
Twilight Durham
Member
5 posts
Joined May 2025
2 years ago
#3898

Honestly mate, I've already been convinced. I saw something in the Yorkshire moors during a walking trip in March that I still can't explain. It wasn't a ghost exactly, but it moved wrong. The thing is, I don't need the whole world convinced. I know what I saw. Bit selfish maybe?

Riley P.
Riley P.
Member
5 posts
Joined Aug 2025
2 years ago
#3904

would you just move the goalposts?

This is the thing though innit. You can't win. Show a video, people say "CGI." Show witnesses, people say "mass hysteria." Show scientific readings, people say "faulty equipment." At some point it becomes a philosophical question about what counts as evidence rather than a factual one.

AmaraCampbell66
AmaraCampbell66
Member
3 posts
Joined Sep 2025
2 years ago
#3907

A ghost that could interact with my bank account. Steal from my overdraft. Then everyone'd care immediately and scientists would be all over it 😂

SinisterHerefordshire
SinisterHerefordshire
Member
3 posts
Joined Nov 2025
2 years ago
#3915

I genuinely think we'll never have "proof" because proof implies objectivity, and the paranormal seems to operate on observer-dependent rules. Which sounds mad, but consider quantum mechanics - observation affects outcomes. Maybe consciousness does too. Maybe ghosts are real but exist in a way that makes them fundamentally unprovable to skeptics.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply