Using phone apps vs dedicated EMF meters—is there actually a difference?

by PriyaDunmore30 · 7 months ago 368 views 4 replies
PriyaDunmore30
PriyaDunmore30
Active Member
24 posts
Joined Oct 2023
7 months ago
#5317

I see a lot of newbies in the community using apps like 'Ghost Radar' or 'EMF Detector' on their mobiles as their main investigative tool. I've always assumed they were basically useless compared to proper handheld EMF meters, but I'm wondering if I'm being elitist about it.

Has anyone actually done proper testing comparing phone apps against dedicated equipment (like the Trifield or a proper gaussmeter)? I suspect the phone sensors aren't sensitive enough and the readings are basically random noise dressed up with spooky graphics, but I'd be interested in actual data rather than assumption.

If phone apps genuinely don't work, I'd like to be able to explain why to newer investigators so they invest in proper kit. And if they do work, I'll admit I've been wrong and maybe recommend some decent app options.

Jonesy19
Jonesy19
Active Member
20 posts
Joined Nov 2023
7 months ago
#5321

Phone apps are mostly rubbish, I'm afraid. The sensors in phones are designed for compass functionality and other stuff - they're not calibrated for actual EMF detection. A proper meter like a Trifield 100XE (£280-300) or even a basic EMF detector (£40-60) will give you far more reliable readings. That said, phones CAN be useful for other things - thermal imaging apps, sound recording, actual cameras obviously. Just don't rely on them for EMF data.

Chuck P.
Chuck P.
Active Member
14 posts
Joined Dec 2023
7 months ago
#5323

I've done side-by-side testing and honestly it depends on the phone and the app. Newer phones with more sensitive magnetometers can actually give decent relative readings. Won't match a dedicated meter for accuracy, but for getting a 'heat map' of magnetic field variations in a location? They work fine. Combined with a proper meter for confirmation readings, they're actually quite useful. Just don't use them as your primary tool.

wobbly_badger
wobbly_badger
Active Member
19 posts
Joined Dec 2023
7 months ago
#5325

If phone apps genuinely don't work, I'd like to be able to explain why to newer investigators

This is the right approach. I'd recommend telling newbies: start with a dedicated meter (even a cheap one) and use phone apps as supplementary tools only. Apps like Ghost Radar are fun but the actual EMF detection is questionable. Save up for proper equipment before doing serious investigations. Garbage data in = garbage conclusions out.

Not AGolem
Not AGolem
Active Member
17 posts
Joined Dec 2023
7 months ago
#5327

The real issue is that phone apps are designed to be entertaining, not scientific. They'll pick up any EM field and then play spooky sounds or show scary words as interpretation, which is complete nonsense. A real EMF meter just gives you numbers. Boring, but honest. If you want to do this properly, invest in actual kit. It's not that expensive and it's the difference between paranormal research and playing a game.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply