So everyone goes on about Rendlesham Forest like it's definitive proof of UFO visitation, but I've just read through the actual declassified statements and... they don't really prove anything conclusive, do they? We've got servicemen seeing lights in the forest, some equipment interference, and a lot of 'I'm not sure what it was.' That's not evidence of extraterrestrials, that's just evidence of something unusual.
The skeptic explanation - missile test, meteor, atmospheric phenomenon - isn't exactly more farfetched than 'aliens landed near an RAF base and no one got good photos.' I'm not saying nothing happened, I'm saying the declassification didn't suddenly make it less ambiguous.
Am I missing something obvious here?