New Subforum: 'Skeptics Welcome' - Let's Keep This Civil

by Ash J. · 3 years ago 198 views 4 replies
Ash J.
Ash J.
Member
3 posts
Joined Nov 2025
3 years ago
#1686

Right, management decision here. We've noticed that a lot of our most interesting threads recently have devolved into 'believers vs skeptics' flamewars, and frankly, we reckon that's because skeptics on this site either don't feel welcome or get dogpiled for raising valid questions.

So we're launching a new subforum called 'Skeptics Welcome' where the ground rules are: you can question, probe, and be constructively skeptical without being accused of being close-minded or a shill. And believers, if you want your ideas tested, this is where that happens. We're not saying everyone needs to agree, but we ARE saying that 'show me evidence' is a legitimate position on a paranormal forum.

Ground rules: No ad hominem attacks. Sources matter. 'Trust me bro' is not evidence. But neither is 'that's impossible because science.' Let's be smarter about this.

First moderator is BertrandRussell42, who is a trained physicist and a proper skeptic, but also listens to weird experiences without immediately dismissing them. Might learn something from each other.

DarkShadow
DarkShadow
Member
4 posts
Joined Mar 2025
3 years ago
#1694

Finally. I've been lurking on here because the true believers drown out anyone who asks basic questions. Looking forward to actually discussing this stuff without being called a 'closed-minded rationalist' for asking how something was measured.

SinisterLeeds
SinisterLeeds
Member
3 posts
Joined Sep 2025
3 years ago
#1707

Good move. Some of my best conversations have been with skeptics because they ask the hard questions that make us believers actually think about what we believe and why. Should make the forum stronger overall.

JapanPilgrim
JapanPilgrim
Member
4 posts
Joined Oct 2025
3 years ago
#1711

No ad hominem attacks. Sources matter.
About time. I'm a believer but I got absolutely roasted last week for citing a study about consciousness and quantum physics - and fair enough, I probably misread it. But the way it was handled was more religion-like than science-like. This subforum sounds good.

Shawna L.
Shawna L.
Member
3 posts
Joined Dec 2025
3 years ago
#1717

Please can we also have a rule about actually reading what the other person wrote before replying? Half these debates are people arguing past each other because nobody's actually listening. Just a thought.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply