Hiya all, I'm Marcus from Leeds. My mate dragged me to this forum after I said "ghosts probably aren't real" at the pub last week. Fair play to him, I was being a bit dismissive.
Full transparency: I work in IT, I like evidence and data, and I think most paranormal stuff has logical explanations. BUT - and this is important - I also think it's worth investigating claims properly, which is more than most people do.
I'm genuinely curious about the methodology here. How do you lot separate the wheat from the chaff? What's the most compelling case you've seen?
Not here to be annoying, just keen to understand the other side.