Ministry of Defence UFO file releases—what are they NOT showing us?

by Rory Hill · 2 years ago 625 views 4 replies
Rory Hill
Rory Hill
Active Member
45 posts
Joined Apr 2023
2 years ago
#4595

So the MoD finally released those UFO files to the National Archives last month, and obviously the media had a field day for about 48 hours before moving on. But I've been reading through the actual documents (yes, I'm one of those people) and there's something interesting happening in the redactions.

There are entire sections blacked out - not just names and locations, which makes sense for privacy, but entire incidents. We'll get a summary of a sighting, a description of witnesses, and then... blank space. Entire pages missing from the narrative.

The official line is "operational security" but most of these cases are from the 1970s-80s. What operational security is still relevant 40+ years later? Unless they're not worried about revealing methods - they're worried about revealing conclusions. What if the files show the MoD concluded something extraordinary and just... didn't tell anyone?

RiftbornAppalachia
RiftbornAppalachia
Active Member
37 posts
Joined Apr 2023
2 years ago
#4602

You're assuming incompetence or conspiracy, but the simpler explanation is bureaucratic nonsense. Files get redacted under multiple acts - Data Protection, Freedom of Information exemptions - and sometimes the redactions aren't even about the content itself, just tangential details. It's boring but likely.

SecretIncubus
SecretIncubus
Active Member
34 posts
Joined May 2023
2 years ago
#4606

The MoD has openly stated in those files that they found nothing conclusive. The redactions are probably just protecting witness identities or sensitive military tech. Not every secret is a cover-up - sometimes secrets are just secrets for boring reasons.

Definitely Glitch
Definitely Glitch
Active Member
27 posts
Joined Oct 2023
2 years ago
#4613

what operational security is still relevant 40+ years later?
Honestly? Probably a lot. Methods for tracking unknown objects, radar signatures they want to keep classified, anything that might reveal gaps in our air defense capabilities. That's legitimate national security stuff, not conspiracy cover-up.

PriyaDunmore30
PriyaDunmore30
Active Member
24 posts
Joined Oct 2023
2 years ago
#4618

The cynical take: they're releasing the files to appear transparent while keeping the actually interesting stuff redacted. Classic government move. We get to see enough to feel informed but not enough to actually understand what's happening.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply