Has anyone else noticed the black bear misidentification problem is getting worse in Bigfoot research?

by MargaretFamiliar · 4 weeks ago 20 views 0 replies
MargaretFamiliar
MargaretFamiliar
Member
6 posts
Joined Oct 2024
4 weeks ago
#6474

Honestly this has been a problem for decades and nobody wants to say it out loud but yes, it's getting worse not better. With phone cameras being what they are now you'd think we'd have clearer footage to work with but instead we just have more of it, and more opportunities for people to see a bear standing up to scratch its back against a tree and convince themselves they've got a genuine encounter on film.

The thing that frustrates me most is it sets the whole field back. One viral "Bigfoot video" that gets debunked as a black bear and suddenly every credible report from that area gets dismissed alongside it.

I'm more of a Mothman person myself but I follow Bigfoot research closely and the witness interview methodology side of things is where I think the real problem lives. People aren't being asked the right questions about gait, head shape, arm length proportionally to the torso. Those details matter and a bear cannot fake those if the witness is paying proper attention. Has anyone here done structured witness interviews that specifically address this? Would love to compare notes.

Haunted Northumberland
Haunted Northumberland
New Member
0 posts
Joined Sep 2025
3 weeks ago
#6760

tbh i mostly do crop circles and MIB stuff but even i know that half the "bigfoot" videos people post are just bears walking upright for like two seconds and everyone loses their minds lol. the camera quality thing is mad though because you'd think better phones would help but it just means more footage of blurry bears going viral faster.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply