Forum update: new moderation policy and changes to evidence standards

by Lily D. · 2 years ago 418 views 6 replies
Lily D.
Lily D.
Member
5 posts
Joined Aug 2025
2 years ago
#4310

Right, we've had some discussions in the mod team over the past few weeks about how this community works and where our standards should be. A few announcements:

1. New Rule on Evidence Claims: If you're making a specific claim about something paranormal ("I saw a UFO," "my house is haunted"), we're now asking for as much detail as possible - dates, times, weather, witnesses, your emotional/physical state. This isn't to dismiss your experience, it's to help us understand it properly and to help the discussion be more useful to other users.

2. Skeptical Comments Are Now Allowed: We've historically been biased toward believers, which wasn't fair. We're now actively encouraging skeptical responses to paranormal claims. Not dismissive comments ("you're mad," "that's obviously fake"), but genuine skeptical inquiry. This makes the forum better, not worse. You lot argue better when someone's actually pushing back.

3. Personal Attacks Are Out: Some of you have been... unkind to each other. Calling people "true believers" or "debunkers" in dismissive tones. Knock it off. You can disagree completely and still be respectful.

We're trying to make this a place where genuine discussion happens - not a echo chamber for believers, and not a platform for skeptical dismissal. Hard balance, but we reckon it's worth trying.

- Moderator Team

Thomas R.
Thomas R.
Member
3 posts
Joined Oct 2025
2 years ago
#4317

Finally. The forum was starting to feel like an echo chamber where anyone who asked reasonable questions got jumped on. Having actual skeptics on here will make the conversations sharper. Good call.

Arthur Q.
Arthur Q.
Member
6 posts
Joined Nov 2025
2 years ago
#4320

Worried this will attract the wrong kind of skeptics - the ones who aren't interested in genuine inquiry but just want to argue and belittle. Hope the mods are prepared for that.

BirminghamObserver
BirminghamObserver
Member
5 posts
Joined Nov 2025
2 years ago
#4321

The detail requirement is good. Too many posts are like "something weird happened," with no information that would actually help anyone. Forcing people to think about specifics will improve the quality of discussion overall. 👍

UnseenHunter586
UnseenHunter586
Active Member
39 posts
Joined Apr 2023
2 years ago
#4331

I like the overall direction but I'm worried about the enforcement. "Personal attacks" is a pretty vague standard. Is calling someone credulous a personal attack? Is saying someone's clearly not being honest? Where's the line?

ParanoidCornwall
ParanoidCornwall
Active Member
32 posts
Joined Jun 2023
2 years ago
#4341

Good moderation is invisible. This announcement suggests you've got some actual policies now rather than just "let people do whatever." That's a positive shift. Looking forward to seeing how it works in practice.

Cagey Drift
Cagey Drift
Active Member
23 posts
Joined Oct 2023
2 years ago
#4348

Skeptical Comments Are Now Allowed: We've historically been biased toward believers, which wasn't fair.

Appreciate the self-awareness on this. This forum was becoming quite insular. Skeptical voices improve discourse whether they're right or wrong. Looking forward to better discussions.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply