First post - Rendlesham Forest connection and I'm confused about chronology

Hello Quirk Reports fam! I'm Jessica, work in aerospace engineering and I've recently fallen down the Rendlesham Forest rabbit hole. For those unfamiliar, it's the most well-documented UFO incident in UK history - 1980, witnesses were US military personnel, absolutely undeniable credibility.

What's bothering me professionally is the physics don't add up with conventional aircraft OR conventional UFO explanations. I've been analyzing the incident reports and the described movements are impossible under current aerodynamics. So either: A) The witnesses were unreliable (they weren't), B) Our understanding of physics is incomplete, or C) Something genuinely non-terrestrial.

I'm hoping to find people on here who've done deep technical analysis of the case. This is my first post but I'm genuinely excited about the community. Any aerospace or physics people here who've looked at this?

Welcome! You've just identified the core question that makes Rendlesham genuinely unusual - the witness credibility combined with the weird flight characteristics. Most UFO sightings have either no credible witnesses or no unusual physics. Rendlesham has both. I've read every declassified document. The radiation readings alone suggest something was actually there.

The aerospace angle is fascinating. What specific movements troubled you from a physics perspective? The levitation aspects? The instantaneous direction changes? Those are usually the bits that break conventional models. If you can break it down technically, we've got some proper engineers on the forum who might dig into it with you.

Something genuinely non-terrestrial.

Or something genuinely terrestrial but technology we don't know about. Military black projects can do weird things. That said, Rendlesham predates most stealth tech so it's hard to explain away. Either way, the incident deserves serious analysis rather than dismissal. Glad to have someone with aerospace background looking at this.

Jessica, honestly the technical analysis angle is underrepresented in paranormal communities. People get caught up in the narrative and forget to actually examine the data. I'd love to see you do a deep dive on the physics. What specifically about the movements violates known principles?