I'm genuinely split on this. Watched it over the weekend with my partner and we had a proper row about it halfway through. Some of the testimony is genuinely compelling - the section on Borley Rectory had my hair standing on end - but the 'dramatic music and conveniently timed thunder' editing made me roll my eyes so hard I nearly saw my brain.
The production quality is decent (£14.99 on Amazon Prime, not bad). Loads of real historical accounts mixed in with some proper tenuous links. One moment they're talking about a documented haunting, the next they're connecting it to a local nobleman who may or may not have had a cat.
Believers: which bits convinced you? Skeptics: where do you think they've overreached? Genuinely interested in both takes because I'm sat on the fence like a confused pigeon.