Been following this one for a while now and I have to say the evidence is more compelling than most give it credit for.
The specific segments people keep flagging - particularly around the Taurus-Littrow valley footage from EVA 2 - do show some suspicious discontinuities in the archived versions compared to what was apparently broadcast live. Whether that's deliberate scrubbing or just decades of poor archival practice, I genuinely can't say for certain.
What bothers me more is who decides which raw footage gets digitised and made publicly accessible. NASA controls that pipeline entirely. No independent verification. That should make anyone uneasy, regardless of where you stand on the moon landings themselves.
I've spent years cross-referencing MIB encounter patterns and one recurring theme is that suppression of evidence rarely looks dramatic - it's usually just quiet administrative decisions. Missing files. "Corrupted". Storage. Budget cuts to archival programmes. Sound familiar?
That said, I'd caution against jumping to conclusions. Some of the ". Missing". Footage claims I've seen circulating on here are frankly sloppy - people confusing different mission numbers or misidentifying footage from Apollo 16. Do your homework before posting.
Has anyone here actually done a proper side-by-side comparison using the Internet Archive copies versus the restored NASA versions? That seems like the most productive line of investigation rather than just speculating.
Would be curious what others have dug up. Particularly interested if anyone's found inconsistencies in the 16mm DAC camera footage specifically - that's where I'd expect anomalies to surface if anything was tampered with.