Okay so I've read through it twice now and I'm genuinely torn. The level of detail he goes into about the craft's movement is hard to just dismiss, like he describes this very specific stuttering motion before it accelerates and that matches other accounts I've seen from completely unrelated witnesses in different states. That bit feels too consistent to be a coincidence.
But I'll be honest - I came from the poltergeist/haunted objects side of things so UFO reports aren't really my area, and I always get a bit cautious when a story is TOO detailed, you know? Sometimes that reads as rehearsed rather than genuine. Genuine witness accounts usually have gaps and confusion in them.
Has anyone cross-referenced the specific date and location with any radar data or flight logs? That would be the first thing I'd want to nail down before getting too deep into the content of the report itself. If theres nothing anomalous in the skies that night then it changes how I'd read the whole thing.
What's everyone else's gut feeling on it?
