Saw it. The bit that caught my attention was the 47 minute gap between the first reported sighting and when the witness claims they were back in their vehicle. That doesn't track with the physical description of what supposedly happened. If you're talking about any kind of structured encounter that involves movement, disorientation, the works - 47 minutes is either way too short or the witness is compressing events without realising it. Happens a lot in abduction accounts, the memory reconstruction fills gaps in a way that actually creates more inconsistencies than it resolves.
The photographic evidence attached to the report is also worth scrutinising. Grain pattern on the alleged craft image looks off to me, more like a drone at low light than anything structured at altitude. Could be wrong. Anyone here done a proper analysis of it yet or are we all just going off the MUFON summary? Because those summaries leave out a lot of the raw witness testimony and thats where the real detail usually lives.
Would like to see the full case file if anyone has access.
