Saw it yeah. Look I've been into this stuff long enough to know that most abduction stories fall apart once you start digging into the details, but Walton's account has always been one of the harder ones to dismiss outright. The polygraph results are a mess depending on which test you look at, and the whole thing with the other loggers being tested as well is something people tend to ignore.
Does it mean it actually happened? No idea. But the story has stayed consistent for decades which is more than you can say for a lot of these cases.
What interview was this specifically though, there's been a few over the years and some are better than others in terms of the questions asked. The ones where he just gets softballed the whole time are a waste of everyones time. Someone needs to actually push back on the timeline gaps properly.