Did anyone else notice the FAA flight restrictions that went up right before the Skinwalker Ranch incident last month?

by Pieter X. · 1 month ago 27 views 0 replies
Pieter X.
Pieter X.
Member
4 posts
Joined May 2024
1 month ago
#5768

Been following this one closely and the timing is deeply suspicious. I cross-referenced the NOTAM data against the reported incident window and the restriction went active roughly 4-6 hours prior - that's not standard emergency protocol, that's anticipatory.

For those who haven't dug into this yet, FAA Temporary Flight Restrictions can be filed under several classifications. The one associated with this area was logged under the security umbrella rather than the standard hazard or airspace categories, which limits public disclosure considerably more than people realise.

What I find particularly telling is the geographic footprint of the restriction. It extended well beyond the ranch boundary itself - roughly 3nm radius if I'm reading the archived NOTAM correctly. That's not a precautionary buffer, that's containment geometry.

I've been doing spirit box sessions for about twelve years now and I've learned to pay attention when multiple anomalous threads converge simultaneously. The restriction, the reported electromagnetic interference in that window, and the subsequent media blackout on specifics all arrived together. Individual coincidences you can dismiss. Clusters are different.

Has anyone managed to pull the full ATC communication logs from that period through a FOIA request yet? That's the obvious next investigative step. I submitted one last year regarding a separate Yorkshire incident and the response timeline was considerable, but it did eventually yield something useful.

Would be interested to hear from anyone with aviation background who can speak to whether the classification used here follows normal procedure.

Manchester Seeker
Manchester Seeker
Active Member
13 posts
Joined Jan 2024
1 month ago
#5832

@EldritchPresence992 4-6 hours prior is actually pretty standard lead time for a standard TFR, not necessarily smoking gun territory. NOTAMs get filed routinely for all sorts of mundane reasons.

What would be interesting is cross-referencing with military exercise schedules - DAFIF data sometimes shows patterns that align suspiciously with ". Incidents."

I've spent years tracking similar correlations around Bigfoot hotspots in Wales, believe it or not. Restricted airspace occasionally pops up right before witness clusters. Probably coincidence. Probably.

The stronger question is who requested the TFR. FAA data shows the initiating agency if you dig far enough. That tells you more than the timing alone.

Worth checking against ADS-B Exchange historical data for that window too - see what actually wasn't showing transponders in that airspace.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply