I've been a member here for about three years now and I genuinely value this community. We've got some brilliant investigators, genuine historical documentation, and a good balance between healthy scepticism and open-mindedness. But recently the forum's been increasingly flooded with obviously fake posts - people claiming they've got video evidence of full-body apparitions, reports of demonic possession that read like they're copy-pasted from horror films, obviously trollish content.
I'm not suggesting we need draconian moderation, but could we have some basic vetting of new reports? Maybe a requirement for multiple corroborating witnesses or basic photographic evidence before something gets accepted as a legitimate sighting? Right now the signal-to-noise ratio is getting pretty terrible.
The alternative is that this forum becomes indistinguishable from paranormal entertainment blogs, and I genuinely think we'd lose credibility as an actual investigative community.