Been thinking about this for years living up here in the mountains, you hear things, people talk. There's a real pattern that's hard to ignore once you start looking at the cases side by side.
Jeffrey Epstein is the obvious one everyone brings up. But dig into some of the lesser-known cases and it gets even stranger. Witnesses in federal cases, whistleblowers, people who suddenly decide to walk in front of trains three days before depositions. The timing is just too consistent to write off every single time.
Not saying every case is foul play. Some genuinely are what they appear to be. But the statistical clustering around key testimony dates... that warrants serious scrutiny at minimum.
Anyone here done a proper deep dive on the older cases, pre-internet era? I suspect the pattern goes back much further than most people realise. Would be interested to hear what others have dug up.