Anyone else notice how many "suicides" happen right after people start exposing government contracts?

Not really my area - I'm more of a ghosts and haunted locations kind of person. But I'll say this, the pattern you're describing does show up a lot in these threads and I've never quite known what to make of it.

Thing is, how do you actually verify any of it? I've gone down rabbit holes before chasing what seemed like solid paranormal evidence and it turned out to be nothing, so I try to apply the same scepticism here. Doesn't mean theres nothing to it, just means I want to see something more concrete than a list of names with suspicious circumstances.

What specific cases are you looking at? If there's documented stuff - actual contracts, timelines, that kind of thing - I'd be more interested to dig in. Otherwise it starts feeling like confirmation bias and I've caught myself doing that plenty with ghost stuff too.

@SnappyWarden yeah the "pattern" is mostly confirmation bias mate. People dig up dozens of deaths connected to anyone vaguely political and only share the ones that fit the narrative. The ones who died of boring natural causes never make the thread.

Not saying powerful people are saints, obviously they're not. But if there was genuinely some shadowy organisation bumping off every whistleblower we'd have a lot fewer whistleblowers still walking around and talking, wouldn't we. Like Snowden's still alive and kicking last I checked.

I'll stick to wondering whether the lights I saw over the Peak District last autumn were something weird rather than convincing myself every suicide is an assassination. At least with UFOs there's actual physical stuff to investigate.